"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/04/2016 at 17:22 • Filed to: None | 3 | 9 |
But this blue ‘63 Pontiac Catalina convertible still likes like a great choice for cruising around on a day like today.
Daily Drives a Dragon - One Last Lap
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 17:26 | 1 |
It’s very nice here as well. A convertible would not be a bad choice for today.
MUSASHI66
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 17:29 | 1 |
Convertible would have been awesome today. Alas, today is the day little fur-ball menace goes to the doggy daycare, and no dogs are allowed in the Abarth. Hence, Forester XT, coated with dust and dog hair is my ride for today.
Party-vi
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 17:35 | 1 |
My parents had a ‘72 convertible. It was beastly and awesome.
lone_liberal
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 17:36 | 1 |
The only bad thing about it is that it doesn’t seat 20.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> lone_liberal
05/04/2016 at 17:37 | 0 |
That’s a Chrysler, but ok.
lone_liberal
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 17:39 | 2 |
It certainly is. He’s got him a Chrysler and it seats about 20. So hurry up and bring your jukebox money.
JR1
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 18:29 | 1 |
Any big boat would be worth driving!
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> JR1
05/04/2016 at 19:28 | 0 |
Not quite any...
JR1
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/04/2016 at 19:33 | 0 |
Most